This page presents the general outline of the project “Critique of the Judiciary”. The outline will be developed step by step. Each title will gradually be linked to a separate page where the relevant argument is explained. The purpose is to build a clear, structured and accessible critique of the existing judiciary — and, more specifically, of the Swedish political-judicial structure — as a foundation for the reforms proposed in this project.
Part One: A General Critique of the Existing Judiciary in the World
1. What is Justice?
2. Why can the judiciary not administer justice without a clear definition of justice?
3. How are Order and Justice related to Morality, Law and Peace?
4. What is the difference between True Law and Non-law?
5. Why is the modern judge in a position of Captive Conscience?
Part Two: A Specific Critique of the Swedish Political-Judicial Structure
1. The Weak Separation of Powers and the Concentration of Power in the Legislature
2. The Absence of a Constitutional Court
3. The Limited and Non-binding Role of Lagrådet, the Council on Legislation
4. The Replacement of Court-Based Justice with Bureaucracy
5. The Rotation of Judges through Government Institutions and Its Damage to the Actual and Apparent Independence and Impartiality of Judges
6. Making the Right to Legal Redress Dependent on Financial Means
7. Institutional Silence as an Instrument of Suppression and the Preservation of a Closed System
Part Three: Documented Cases and Swedish Experiences
1. Mental Hospital: The Realpolitik Answer to a Reasonable Request
2. The Case of Children Kept Hungry in Private Preschools
3. Andas. Överlev. (Breathe. Survive.)
Part Four: The Exit Strategy
1. Breaking the Silence
2. Demanding Definitions of Justice, Law, Right, Morality, Dignity and Peace
3. Implementing the Education Demanded in Article 26(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
4. The Link between Educational, Judicial and Political Reform
5. Making Accountability a Universal Standard